Macro & Markets Weekly — Apr 16, 2026

The world's institutions spent this week putting numbers on a war. The IMF cut projected global growth to 3.1% for 2026 and raised projected global inflation to 4.4% for 2026, US CPI printed its hottest month since mid-2022 (0.9% month-over-month in March), China beat its Q1 2026 GDP target while exporting deflation, and the S&P 500 closed above 7,000 on a rally so narrow that the options market is already pricing the reversal. Every central bank is now navigating the same trade-off — fight inflation or protect growth — and the data this week made clear you cannot do both. The ceasefire is holding. The economic damage is already in the numbers.

• IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2026 (IMF): Full scenario framework — baseline, adverse, severe — with global growth projected at 3.1% for 2026 and inflation projected at 4.4% for 2026.
• Federal Reserve Beige Book, April 2026 (Federal Reserve): District-level anecdotal report through April 6 documenting elevated input costs, tariff uncertainty, and rate-sensitive demand.
• CDX Financials Index (S&P Dow Jones Indices): New credit-default swap index covering 25 North American financial entities — the first standardized instrument for shorting private credit exposure.
• CBO Budget and Economic Outlook 2026–2036 (Congressional Budget Office): Ten-year fiscal projection showing FY2026 deficit at $1.9 trillion (5.8% of GDP), rising to $3.1 trillion by 2036.
• China Q1 2026 GDP Release (National Bureau of Statistics): 5.0% year-on-year growth in Q1 2026, beating 4.8% consensus, with industrial output up 6.1% and retail sales at 2.4% year-on-year.

The IMF's April World Economic Outlook doesn't hedge. Its title — Global Economy in the Shadow of War — sets the tone. Chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas said at Tuesday's briefing: "The war has stopped that momentum and we now project growth of 3.1 percent this year, with inflation rising to 4.4 percent."

The numbers that matter for planning: projected global inflation is up 0.6 percentage points from the January forecast. The Middle East and Central Asia region projection was cut by 2 full percentage points to 1.9% for 2026. The eurozone projection drops to 1.1% for 2026. The US projection was trimmed a tenth to 2.3% for 2026 — which sounds reassuring until you remember US CPI printed 0.9% month-over-month in March.

The scenario architecture is what risk committees should be stress-testing. The adverse scenario — further energy disruption and tighter financial conditions — projects 2.5% global growth and 5.4% inflation for 2026. The severe scenario — supply disruptions extending into 2027 — projects 2% growth and inflation above 6%. That severe scenario has historically been associated with global recession, and most corporate planning models don't include a scenario that bad.

If the ceasefire holds and Brent crude stays below $100, the baseline survives. If it breaks, the adverse scenario could become the base case quickly. Observable signals to watch: Brent crude and the ceasefire expiration window. The IMF also flagged an underappreciated balance-sheet channel — a stronger dollar leaves emerging-market sovereigns with dollar-denominated liabilities more vulnerable, a risk the soft-landing consensus had been ignoring.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported CPI up 0.9% month-over-month in March — triple February's pace, the hottest monthly print since mid-2022. Core CPI (excluding food and energy) rose 0.4% in March. The energy spike, occurring amid Strait of Hormuz disruptions, was a central driver.

The number that should sit in every compensation model: nominal average hourly earnings rose roughly 0.2% in March, meaning real average hourly earnings fell about 0.6% in March. That's a classic stagflation signal — households losing purchasing power even as nominal wages inch up. For corporate planning, it implies weaker consumer discretionary demand alongside stickier input costs. Retail, autos, and hospitality feel this first.

If this is a one-month energy spike that reverses with a sustained ceasefire, the Fed can look through it. If April's print shows core broadening — services inflation accelerating and shelter costs re-firming — the "transitory energy shock" narrative would break down and rate-cut expectations could be pushed into 2027. Watch the April CPI release and whether the PPI pipeline (March PPI rose 0.5%, per the BLS release) continues feeding through to consumer prices.

China's GDP grew 5.0% year-on-year in Q1 2026, beating the 4.8% consensus and accelerating from Q4 2025. The beat is real. The composition is the problem.

Industrial output rose 6.1% year-on-year while retail sales grew just 2.4% year-on-year — the same structural imbalance that has defined China's recovery for two years. The economy is making things; it's not buying them domestically. Nominal GDP has trailed real GDP for a prolonged stretch, signaling weak price-level dynamics are structurally constraining domestic activity. Beijing is running a roughly $51 billion monthly trade surplus, meaning growth is being kept afloat by external demand.

As Caixin's analysis put it, China is exporting deflation into global goods markets — a dynamic that complicates how advanced-economy policymakers think about tariffs and industrial policy. The export engine is already decelerating: March exports grew just 2.5% year-on-year, down sharply from 21.8% in January–February, as the Iran war's impact on energy costs filters through.

The Q1 beat buys Beijing time. Full-year 2026 GDP is forecast at 4.6%, with further softening expected if oil stays above $100. Société Générale analysts noted the strong print should give policymakers room to hold off stimulus at the late-April Politburo meeting. If Beijing signals additional fiscal support anyway, that's bullish for industrial metals and global demand in H2. If they stay patient, it confirms the export-deflation model persists.

The ECB was widely expected to consider policy easing at its April 30 meeting; were the ECB to cut its deposit rate by 25 basis points to 2.25%, it would signal the institution is prioritizing the growth collapse over inflation risks, at least for now.

The March statement was unusually candid about paralysis: "The war in the Middle East has made the outlook significantly more uncertain, creating upside risks for inflation and downside risks for economic growth." Staff projections showed headline inflation averaging 2.6% in 2026 with growth at just 0.9% — the definition of stagflation.

Germany's wholesale prices rose 2.7% month-on-month in March, well above the 0.6% consensus, signaling that energy-cost pass-through into Europe's manufacturing core is accelerating. Eurozone industrial production printed a sharp monthly contraction of roughly 1.5% in March. That combination — rising input costs and falling output — is precisely the bind that makes ECB policy difficult.

For any company with European operations: credit conditions are tightening not because the ECB is hiking, but because uncertainty itself is doing the work. A weaker euro from easing would re-import energy-cost-driven inflation into the bloc. Watch Lagarde's next press conference for language on "second-round effects" — that's the phrase that signals whether the ECB thinks inflation is passing through to wages.

JPMorgan posted Q1 2026 earnings of $5.94 per share against a $5.45 consensus. Bank of America reported $1.11 per share for Q1 2026, up 25% year-over-year. FactSet's early read shows blended S&P 500 Q1 2026 earnings growth tracking in the low double digits. The beats are real.

But executives flagged geopolitical risk, energy volatility, and consumer credit normalization in the same breath. Loan loss provisions — money set aside for loans that might go bad — increased quarter-over-quarter. The divergence between trading revenue (record) and loan book quality (softening) is the tell: banks are making money on volatility, not on a healthy credit cycle.

One structural factor markets are underweighting: regulatory proposals moving through the Federal Register could materially alter risk-weighted capital calculations, potentially freeing hundreds of billions in lending capacity. Morgan Stanley's analysis highlights a large excess-capital read for big banks. That means reported earnings strength could be followed by policy-driven re-leveraging — supporting credit and bank profits even as the real economy weakens.

The signal to watch: regional bank earnings over the next two weeks. Unlike the trading-heavy mega-banks, regionals will show the pure credit-cycle signal. If their net interest margins and loan growth deteriorate, credit conditions are tightening faster than headline bank beats suggest.

Delta reported record March-quarter revenue, nearly 10% above last year, and guided to low-teens revenue growth in the June quarter while assuming all-in fuel at roughly $4.30 per gallon. That combination is the week in miniature: demand is holding, costs are brutal.

The macro read-through is direct. Corporate and leisure travel demand hasn't cracked, which means parts of the economy still have pricing power. That's good for growth and bad for disinflation. Demand is not weak enough to do the Fed's job for it.

If other cyclicals report the same pattern — firm revenue, messier cost lines — the soft-landing story gets more inflationary and less benign. If Delta's June-quarter guidance is revised down on fuel, it would suggest the ceasefire premium is already priced in and the margin squeeze is accelerating. Watch airline and industrial guidance language through the rest of earnings season.

The S&P 500 closed at 7,022.95 — a new all-time high. Only about 55% of stocks were trading above their 200-day moving average, according to CNBC's analysis, down notably from broader participation a month ago. The advance/decline line has not confirmed the new high.

The VIX term structure remains in backwardation — traders are paying more for near-term protection than for longer-dated insurance, which is not the shape of a market that believes risk is behind it. Margin debt sits at a record $1.28 trillion as of mid-April 2026, amplifying fragility. The options market is telling a different story than the headline index: measures of skew — the price of out-of-the-money puts relative to calls — have widened materially, meaning institutional money is paying up for disaster insurance even as the cash market prints new highs.

The S&P at 7,000 is a ceasefire relief trade and bank earnings beat, not a fundamental repricing of the growth outlook. The IMF just cut global growth. Real wages went negative in March. The Fed is on hold. If the Russell 2000 continues to lag the S&P — small caps are more sensitive to domestic credit conditions — the breadth problem is structural, not temporary.

The Congressional Budget Office projects the FY2026 federal deficit at $1.9 trillion — 5.8% of GDP, well above the 3.8% historical average. By 2036: $3.1 trillion, or 6.7% of GDP. The CBO's projection shows materially higher deficits relative to earlier estimates.

This is the slow-moving story that makes "higher for longer" a structural condition, not just a Fed policy choice. Even if the Fed cuts rates, the term premium — the extra yield investors demand to hold long-dated Treasuries — stays elevated as long as Treasury issuance keeps growing to fund the gap. The 10-year yield has a structural floor that didn't exist five years ago.

For any CFO modeling capex against a long-term cost of capital: the CBO's numbers suggest the 10-year yield is unlikely to return to the 3–3.5% range that defined the 2010s. That changes the math on every long-duration investment — semiconductor fabs, biotech pipelines, commercial real estate. Watch upcoming Treasury auction sizes and reception for confirmation that the market is demanding more compensation.

Banco de México cut its benchmark rate by 50 basis points to 9.5% this week — into an environment where the Fed is on hold and global inflation is rising. That divergence carries real FX risk: a narrower interest-rate differential puts downward pressure on the peso, which raises import costs and feeds back into the inflation Banxico is trying to manage.

Mexico cut amid a faster slowdown in growth than in inflation, a small-scale stagflation trap that many commodity-importing emerging-market central banks are navigating. The IMF's WEO was explicit: slowdown and inflation increases are expected to be particularly pronounced in emerging market and developing economies. Brazil's central bank cut its growth forecast this week. Chile held, citing persistent inflation risks. The EM policy divergence is accelerating, and the dollar's strength is the transmission mechanism.

Watch USD/MXN. If the peso weakens materially, it will show up in Q2 earnings guidance for every US company with significant Mexico manufacturing or revenue exposure.

The IMF titled its outlook "Shadow of War" and meant it literally, the S&P crossed 7,000 while only half its stocks could keep up, and Wall Street built a brand-new financial instrument specifically to bet that the $2 trillion private credit market is about to find out what marking-to-market feels like.

Somewhere a CCC-rated issuer is looking at its refinancing window, then at the carry trade positioning data, then at the ceasefire clock, and thinking: at least the IMF has a severe scenario for me.

Stay sharp.

If someone you know is making decisions against a cost-of-capital assumption from January, forward them this.

Tariffs carved out semiconductors and pharma — but the carve-outs are temporary, and the clock is running. Read → Tariff Earthquake Lands — Chips and Drugs Get a Temporary Pass, Not a Permanent One