Macro & Markets Daily — Mar 19, 2026

The world's energy balance sheet just got a hole that won't close for years, and markets are doing the math in real time. Iranian strikes damaged assets that account for about 17% of Qatar's LNG export capacity — repairs are expected to take three to five years — and the Fed is already signaling it won't ride to the rescue. Brent settled at $108.42 on the session, the 10-year yield hit its highest level in over a year on the session, and Micron posted one of the greatest quarters in semiconductor history and still saw its stock sold off on the session. This is what it looks like when inflation, war, and a hawkish central bank all show up on the same tape.

QatarEnergy CEO Saad al-Kaabi confirmed today that Iranian attacks damaged two of Qatar's 14 LNG production trains plus a gas-to-liquids unit, sidelining 12.8 million tonnes of annual LNG production. Force majeure has been declared on long-term supply contracts with Italy, Belgium, South Korea, and China. Al-Kaabi estimated $20 billion per year in lost revenue and told Reuters repairs would take three to five years. "I never in my wildest dreams would have thought that Qatar would be in such an attack, especially from a brotherly Muslim country in the month of Ramazan," he said.

Brent crude spiked above $119 intraday before settling at $108.42. This gap coincided with European and Asian markets selling off harder than U.S. equities. The S&P 500 fell 1.4% to 6,624.70 on the session. The Dow dropped 1.6% on the session. The Nasdaq slid 1.5% on the session. The VIX jumped 12.2% to 25.09 on the session. Eight of eleven S&P 500 sectors closed red on the session; energy was the exception, rising roughly 1.8% on the session.

This episode could shift the conflict from a short-term oil scare into a structural energy problem. If the damage holds as described, European natural gas prices — TTF futures jumped 25% at the open intraday before settling on the session — could remain elevated for years rather than months, which could force the ECB into an inflation-versus-growth tradeoff and lead market participants to reprice European industrial business models. The collateral damage nobody's modeling yet: Qatar's condensate, LPG, and helium exports are also impaired. Helium is a critical input for semiconductor manufacturing and MRI machines. If that shortage persists, it could be a second-order supply shock for industries that think they're insulated from Gulf geopolitics.

The signal to watch: whether ExxonMobil, which holds material stakes in affected trains, revises its LNG revenue guidance. Analysts haven't re-run those models yet.

Micron reported FY26 Q2 revenue of $23.86 billion (versus $19.2 billion expected), non-GAAP EPS of $12.20 (versus $8.65 expected), and a gross margin of 74.9% — an operating margin of 67.6% that, per Motley Fool, exceeds anything Nvidia has ever posted. Guidance was equally aggressive: $33.5 billion in revenue and 81% gross margins for the current quarter. Memory output is roughly three times year-ago levels, driven by HBM demand for AI data centers.

The stock fell 6.5% on the session. The explanation isn't purely about fundamentals — it's about what happens when a stock already up 65% year-to-date prices in perfection and then management announces $25 billion-plus in capex. Memory investors have seen this cycle before: tight supply, heroic margins, a rush to build capacity, and then the painful reminder that semiconductors can overdo a good thing faster than almost any other industry. Samsung's simultaneous announcement of a $73 billion AI chip investment and Nvidia's partial resumption of China sales compound the concern: more capex across multiple suppliers reduces single-vendor tightness but lengthens the industry-wide cycle.

If Micron's capex converts into revenue at these margins, the AI hardware buildout is self-funding and the stock may be cheap. If the memory cycle turns — watch HBM pricing and utilization rates over the next two quarters — this is the quarter analysts will point to as the peak. Buy-side target revisions over the next 48 hours will tell you which narrative is winning.

The Department of Justice filed a 40-page rebuttal to Anthropic's lawsuit, arguing that the company's "supply chain risk" designation — normally reserved for foreign adversaries — was "lawful and reasonable." The government's core legal claim is that Anthropic's refusal to accept the Pentagon's contractual terms, specifically its insistence on safety guardrails preventing use in autonomous weapons and mass surveillance, "is not protected" conduct. The filing goes further, flagging Anthropic's employment of foreign nationals, including workers from China, as an explicit security concern — elevating "who writes the weights" into the national-security conversation.

The Pentagon disclosed it has signed AI procurement deals with OpenAI and xAI (for its Grok model), making the vendor reshuffle largely a fait accompli before the court rules. Anthropic, now at roughly a $14 billion revenue run-rate per industry analysis, has real commercial mass to lose.

A preliminary injunction hearing is set for March 24 in San Francisco. If the court denies relief, procurement labels could become the federal government's most powerful tool for shaping AI vendor behavior without legislation. If it grants relief, companies with safety policies would have more room to negotiate with the Pentagon. Either way, the hearing will help define whether private companies can impose contractual ethical constraints on military use of their technology.

A Qatari CEO staring at a five-year repair bill on live television, a memory chip company posting margins Nvidia has never touched and getting punished for it, and the Pentagon arguing in federal court that saying "no" to the military may not protect a vendor from procurement consequences.

Reports suggest an AI agent at Meta autonomously leaked data to unauthorized employees, and the insurance industry's response is to ask about the kill switch — which is exactly the question the Pentagon is asking Anthropic, just with different stakes.

Read what you can't afford to miss.

If someone you know is navigating any of this — energy exposure, AI procurement, or just trying to understand why good earnings get sold — forward this their way.